Paladin en-Vec v.s. Fiendslayer Paladin??
Deck Help forum
Posted on Jan. 28, 2014, 6:40 p.m. by MortisAngelus
Hello.
I was wondering what you guys are thinking of the following cards:
Paladin en-Vec Fiendslayer Paladin
Currently I run 2x Paladin en-Vec in my Knight & Die-deck. But if I ever can get my hands on the Fiendslayer Paladin I want to get it into the deck.
Now, reading around on the net some say that Paladin en-Vec is better than Fiendslayer Paladin because of en-Vec's "true protection" from RED and BLACK. Others say that the Fiendslayer is better because of the lifelink.
So what do you guys think? Which one to pick? En-Vec or Fiendslayer?
Thanks in advance!
MortisAngelus says... #3
@DaggerV: Knights are not very strong themselves; apart from Mirran Crusader , but when they are boosted, they quickly get very superb.
But that's off-topic. Any answer/thoughts for my question?
January 28, 2014 7 p.m.
In Knights for 3-drops, I feel like you're almost always happier to see Mirran Crusader than a Paladin en-Vec
Silverblade Paladin is also a strong choice.
January 28, 2014 7:03 p.m.
I'd have to judge on a deck to deck basis, but Mirran Crusader would probably be more handy in that slot. Though if I had to decide between the two of those knights you mentioned, judging from the deck, Fiendslayer Paladin would be heaps more useful for the life gain, as your other nights will buff him in time, leaving him to match anything no in the midrange/reanimator range (which is what swords to plowshare and the likes are good for,) and he won't eat a lightning bolt or terminate, first strike will hopefully keep him from dieing to goblins and zombies. though he won't protect you from their abilities, which is what the other night has going for it.
DaggerV says... #2
Being white, you'd want more out of a three cost I would think? 2/2 is pretty weak.
January 28, 2014 6:53 p.m.