unravel the aether, worth playing on sideboard?

Deck Help forum

Posted on Feb. 28, 2014, 2:56 p.m. by teamplayerx

Alright so I am main boarding Polis Crusher mainly cause i think it is better than Polukranos, World Eater overall and is more flexible. Since the Polis Crusher can destroy enchantments and is proc enchantments, is it still worth putting unravel the aether in sideboard?

In the meta game at the moment, other than G/R monster decks playing xenagos, but mainly for his combat ability, how many people are really playing enchantments and/or gods and/or other artifacts that this card is worth having on the sideboard? 20%+ of meta

I mean mono-black wouldn't sideboard in their god against me because of its just not that great because im not about life gaining.They might sideboard in the whip, but Blind Obedience with Polis Crusher kind of helps out against that. Also mono-black should side out Underworld Connections . 30% of meta

No one really plays mono-blue anymore thanks to Bile Blight in the meta.

Control decks really dont use enchantments or artifacts. Mainly just planeswalkers and spells, and thats about 30% of meta.

http://tappedout.net/mtg-decks/bow-to-naya/

I was thinking if it isn't worth it put Fleecemane Lion or Tajic, Blade of the Legion against control, or Loxodon Smiter .

Thoughts?

Magiclover318 says... #2

February 28, 2014 3:09 p.m.

Cobthecobbler says... #3

Unravel the Aether is definitely worth sideboarding when there's no other option. Although, Revoke Existence might be a more valuable spell, because it exiles it.

February 28, 2014 3:26 p.m.

KingSorin says... #4

Unravel the Aether is instant speed, so i think it's better than Revoke Existence honestly.

February 28, 2014 4:25 p.m.

Cobthecobbler says... #5

That's true, but there's always the chance you'll see that card again with Unravel

February 28, 2014 4:34 p.m.

This discussion has been closed