Trading Sealed Products for Singles

Economics forum

Posted on Jan. 31, 2016, 9:57 p.m. by DivineGrace

So, which pile would you take

Pile A:4 Green C14 Decks

Pile B:1x Breeding Pool (Gatecrash)1x Steam Vents (Guildpact)1x Maze of Ith (The Dark)2x Watery Grave (Ravnica)1x Scroll Rack (Tempest)

Would you?

Basically is it common sense to trade useless sealed products for for sure good legacy/modern staples?

"Decks"? How many decks are we taking here?

January 31, 2016 9:57 p.m.

Atony1400 says... #3

Do the math, are the cards in 1 C14 deck (multiplied times 4) equal to the cost of those modern staples?

January 31, 2016 10:01 p.m.

TheFoilAjani says... #4

You want the singles.

January 31, 2016 10:07 p.m.

ThisIsBullshit says... #5

I'd take the second pile in a heartbeat.

January 31, 2016 10:07 p.m.

And didn't see that 4. Whoops. It says about $30 dollars on most sites, sometimes a bit more, so that's $120. Even though there's about a $20 difference between the piles, I would choose the staple pile. There's barely anything of value in the precon.

January 31, 2016 10:07 p.m. Edited.

Pile 2 without a doubt.

January 31, 2016 10:26 p.m.

mpeach1 says... #8

Oh yea pile 2 for sure

January 31, 2016 10:50 p.m.

brandontraps says... #9

Pile 2 all day

January 31, 2016 11:25 p.m.

Absolutely pile 2. Those decks are fine to buy if you're gonna play with them, but no one plays with four of the same deck, and there aren't enough valuable pieces in the decks to be worth breaking down and selling. You can't resell the decks very easily, because most people can still get them from a game store, and will do so if they actually want the deck.

February 1, 2016 1:55 a.m.

Guftders says... #11

Pile 2. If Pile 1 consisted of 4 different commander decks (and preferably either the 1st series or c13) then I'd take pile 1, but I'd rather have the singles.

February 1, 2016 7:34 a.m.

rorofat says... #12

Definitely pile 2. It's more likely to go up in price, plus, the cards are actually good cards.

February 1, 2016 10:36 a.m.

This discussion has been closed