Ulamog, the Ceaseless Hunger Price

Economics forum

Posted on Jan. 27, 2016, 10:16 p.m. by smackder

Hey guys, im a tron player and Ulamog, the Ceaseless Hunger is a sweet upgrade for my Sundering Titan's. I really should have brought the two i need when they were $15 each, but they're now $30 each. Is there any point of me waiting for them to drop in price back to $15 or do you think they'll stay around $30? Cheers

CastleSiege says... #2

All the B/X Eldrazi decks seem to run at least 1-2 copies. If they become a serious contender in the format his price could continue to rise. If you really want him for your deck I'd say buy then now regardless if they rise or fall.

January 27, 2016 10:21 p.m.

smackder says... #3

CastleSiege Yea that's what i'm afraid of, thanks for the advice

January 27, 2016 10:26 p.m.

TheHroth says... #4

I'd agree to just buy them now. If you wait and they go up, you'll regret it. If you buy now and they drop, well you pay more for food and that only provides instant gratification. Newlamog will keep you happy time and time again! Worth buying for sure.

If he drops, it won't be much until after he rotates out of standard, which is not for a good while (whenever the block AFTER Shadows Over Innistrad is released). His modern playability will keep him 20-30, even if the Eldrazi deck loses hype.

January 27, 2016 10:58 p.m.

dan8080 says... #5

As someone who plays the Br eldrazi deck, I can vouch that the hype is pretty real and he's a must as a 2-of in my opinion. Like I built it cause it looked goofy and my kind of deck and after running it to get a feel for it against other top decks it is really hard to beat even with land disruption. So i'd agree with these guys it is definitely worth picking them up

January 27, 2016 11:32 p.m.

TMBRLZ says... #6

Not to mention the future potential Eldrazi decks in general have in the format.

January 28, 2016 11:46 a.m.

smackder says... #7

Thanks for all your comments guys, managed to trade for one last night, so only 1 more to buy.

January 29, 2016 12:28 a.m.

This discussion has been closed