Wasteland Price

Economics forum

Posted on Feb. 2, 2016, 9:40 p.m. by Terrvex

I recently acquired a Wasteland from a friend. Should I sell/trade it off now or is it likely to rise in price in the future?

Thanks.

Unless it gets a ban in EDH or legacy, it's not going down.

February 2, 2016 9:45 p.m.

Epochalyptik says... #3

It won't get banned, and it won't get reprinted (save for special editions). So basically, the question is whether you need the money now or whether you feel comfortable with a non-actualized asset.

February 2, 2016 9:52 p.m.

Saw a bit of a price drop, but it very well could increase in value.

I'd be up for trading for it.

February 2, 2016 10:46 p.m.

Pure rumor, but if Eternal Masters is actually a thing, then it could drop. That said, the validity of Eternal Masters is pretty questionable and Wasteland is a legacy staple and will be forever.

February 2, 2016 10:51 p.m. Edited.

CastleSiege says... #6

It's a stable card whose price probably won't see much of a change, if at all, any time soon. Eternal Masters will never be a thing outside of MTGO because of the reserved list.

February 2, 2016 11:18 p.m.

Servo_Token says... #7

CastleSiege

It's meant to be a reprinting of legacy playable cards that are not on the reserve list. Force of will, Wasteland, thalia, price of progress, things of that nature. Of course there won't be duals or whatever, but it is meant to be made to the best of wizard's ability around the list, and kin to the modern masters set.

February 3, 2016 midnight

HeavyR says... #8

I too opened an expedition wasteland, and was wondering about it. Other than inflation, i don't see the value increasing drastically. If you can get two hundred in cash, id prolly take it.

February 3, 2016 12:45 a.m.

Terrvex says... #9

Thanks guys.

HeavyR, unfortunately I didn't pull an expedition wasteland and I'm referring to the actual tempest version. Good for you though, that's super lucky.

February 3, 2016 1:45 a.m.

Femme_Fatale says... #10

Its getting reprinted.

February 15, 2016 4:14 p.m.

This discussion has been closed