Small sleeves?

Gear forum

Posted on March 16, 2016, 5:59 p.m. by Sme4

When I ordered my playset of Inkmoth Nexus they all came in this really neat small card-tight sleeve that had a ultra-pro sleeve directly over it. What brand is this sleeve, I would love too buy more. Thanks!

smackjack says... #2

KFC Perfect Fit

March 16, 2016 6:07 p.m.

pskinn01 says... #3

kmc "perfect fit" and ultra pro pro-fit are two brands, but there are others.

here is a video looking at different brands

But KMC is the recommended brand.

March 16, 2016 6:10 p.m. Edited.

MTGNuclear says... #4

My LGS stopped selling the ultra pros ones because they were so bad. Do not buy them. KMC in the other hand is great. I highly recommend it!

March 16, 2016 6:45 p.m.

Arvail says... #5

I think it's odd that there's players in MtG who are dropping $150 on lands but don't know what perfect fits are. Not trying to make fun of you here, btw.

March 16, 2016 6:47 p.m.

Ohthenoises says... #6

Kentucky Fried Chicken makes sleeves smackjack? DELICIOUS!

March 16, 2016 9:15 p.m.

ChiefBell says... #7

Get that unique blend of herbs and spices on your ABUR duals!

March 17, 2016 5:10 a.m.

alanwescoat says... #8

The KFC Bucket o' Sleeves is a sweet deal!

March 17, 2016 6:07 a.m.

TheAnnihilator says... #9

In case it wasn't clear, smackjack actually meant KMC Perfect Fit sleeves.

KMC are the ones that I use, and I've never been unhappy. I have heard recently about a side-loading brand of perfect fits, and received one in the mail on a card ordered from tcgplayer. Not sure what the brand is called, but it was very cool.

March 17, 2016 9:26 a.m.

Ohthenoises says... #10

We know TheAnnihilator, we were teasing smackjack about the typo.

pskinn01 answered the question quite well already so the thread got goofy.

March 17, 2016 9:51 a.m.

Oh, I wasn't trying to correct everyone else, it was just for the OP (since he/she probably hadn't heard of KMC and would just be confused by the KFC jokes). I should have added "@Sme4". Sorry guys.

March 17, 2016 10:09 a.m.

This discussion has been closed