Rorix Bladewing and Bladewing the Risen

Lore forum

Posted on Dec. 2, 2014, 12:05 a.m. by kungfuturtle

Who was he? what is his story? Is he evil when he becomes the risen? Tell me more I am fascinated about this character.

Rorix Bladewing and Bladewing the Risen

BrennanM says... #2

Rorix was a dragon from Shiv who wound up as a pit fighter along with Jareth, Leonine Titan, Arcanis the Omnipotent, Visara the Dreadful, and Silvos, Rogue Elemental in the Grand Coliseum during Onslaught block. He was killed in the fights and reanimated as Bladewing the Risen presumably by the Cabal who were known for that sort of thing. At least that's how I remember it.

December 2, 2014 12:32 a.m.

kungfuturtle says... #3

Okay

December 2, 2014 12:40 a.m.

AussieBloke says... #4

Fella just gave you all that and your response is "Okay"! Ha!

December 2, 2014 2:54 a.m.

acarmelo1 says... #5

yup that's how it goes :D

December 2, 2014 3:09 p.m.

FaustHarbinger says... #6

So much for being "Fascinated"

December 3, 2014 5:11 p.m.

kungfuturtle says... #7

I WANT MORE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! better?

December 3, 2014 9:31 p.m.

AussieBloke says... #8

Now you just sound greedy. All jokes aside, I laughed the first time because instead of "Gee, thanks" or "that was quite informative, thank you sir" he got a flat "Okay". Still cracks me up.

December 3, 2014 9:39 p.m.

kungfuturtle says... #9

I guess I was hoping for volumes and novels worth of story. Like here is a link to the book where he is the main character. I was a little underwhelmed but didn't mean to sound ungrateful.

December 3, 2014 9:43 p.m.

BrennanM says... #10

FWIW, I had no problem with your response. I don't think there is more to the story about him though. The books really followed Kamahl and his ilk instead of the pit fighters.

December 3, 2014 11:11 p.m.

kungfuturtle says... #11

That is disappointing. If Wizards is going to make a legendary creature they should at least flesh..... them out. Eh see what I did there.

December 3, 2014 11:27 p.m.

This discussion has been closed