Fires of Yavimaya or Rhythm of the Wild?

Modern Deck Help forum

Posted on Jan. 19, 2019, 9:24 a.m. by DemonDragonJ

I have a red/green deck that contains two copies of Fires of Yavimaya , but, with the printing of Rhythm of the Wild in Ravnica Allegiance, I am considering using that card, instead, since it is more versatile.

What does everyone else think of that? Should I replace fires of Yavimaya with rhythm of the wild?

APPLE01DOJ says... #2

Considering that Fires isn't modern legal yes you should.

I forget the name but there is a 1 mana card that gives all your creatures haste.

January 19, 2019 9:56 a.m.

CharonSquared says... #3

Mass Hysteria is all creatures.

January 19, 2019 11:02 a.m.

DemonDragonJ says... #4

APPLE01DOJ, yes, I was already considering changing the card, but your words have helped me to finalize that decision.

CharonSquared, I do not wish to provide benefits to my opponents' creatures, and I also really appreciate the versatility of RotW.

January 19, 2019 11:50 a.m.

Rzepkanut says... #5

Rhythm is amazing. It's light years ahead of Fires. Even if both cards were modern legal it would still be no contest.

January 19, 2019 2:07 p.m.

sylvannos says... #6

@Rzepkanut: Not necessarily. Rhythm of the Wild doesn't affect creatures already in play or token creatures. For instance, if I'm in a topdeck war, I'd much rather draw Fires of Yavimaya that would help push damage through.

Not to mention, Fires of Yavimaya lets your creature have haste, attack, then get +2/+2. Even if you draw a Birds of Paradise , your opponent has to worry about getting BTFO'd.

January 19, 2019 2:27 p.m.

DemonDragonJ says... #7

sylvannos, the deck in which I have Fires of Yavimaya does not generate any tokens, so I do not need to worry about your first sentence, but your second sentence does make an excellent point, so I still am uncertain about which card to use.

January 20, 2019 3:08 p.m.

coltron518 says... #8

why would you still be uncertain when Fires of Yavimaya isn't modern legal? could you link the deck so we can see it?

January 20, 2019 3:12 p.m.

DemonDragonJ says... #9

coltron518, I forgot that it was not legal in modern when I posted this thread, here; I should have posted it in another section.

January 20, 2019 3:48 p.m.

Please login to comment