How to Break Storm Crow

Modern forum

Posted on Nov. 25, 2014, 12:29 p.m. by Doc28

Hello, I am having a budget modern deck-building contest with my friend, and in order to troll him I need to be able to crush him with a deck based on Storm Crows. Any ideas?

Servo_Token says... #2

Just make mono blue flyers. Gravitational Shift, Favorable Winds, Warden of Evos Isle, some other things like that...

November 25, 2014 12:31 p.m.

Doc28 says... #3

that's a good idea, but what about ideas for a deck that REVOLVES around Storm Crow instead of one that just uses it?

November 25, 2014 2:34 p.m.

Asher18 says... #4

its a good idea, actually. boosting the crap out of it, maybe adding some tutors SPECIFICALLY for storm crow, kill spells, targeting storm crow with a metric crap ton of enchantments and equipment, go for it!

November 25, 2014 3:40 p.m.

seuvius says... #5

I couldn't realm imagine building a deck around a 1/2 flyer with no abilities when there are so many better options,I understand he's the big joke in magic but I personally couldn't see any fun being had out of a storm crow deck.

November 25, 2014 5:04 p.m.

Doc28 says... #6

the fun happens when your opponent thinks your stupid and you wreck him

November 25, 2014 5:21 p.m.

SkyRaider42 says... #7

You're saying this like storm crow needs to be broken any more than it already is

November 25, 2014 6:03 p.m.

Doc28 says... #8

hehe lol

November 25, 2014 9:02 p.m.

JexInfinite says... #9

November 26, 2014 12:33 a.m.

Countertop says... #10

a set of mirran swords would do quite nicely in terms of helping Storm Crow smash face if thats what you were looking for...?

November 26, 2014 8:22 a.m.

Doc28 says... #11

yeah, thanks

November 26, 2014 10:30 a.m.

codebread says... #12

I think Storm Crow into Nevermore naming Storm Crow would work wonders.

November 26, 2014 9:01 p.m.

vishnarg says... #13

Favorable Winds? You could run some swords and make it voltronish, he kinda can play like Squadron Hawk in an old Caw blade build...

November 27, 2014 7:35 p.m.

This discussion has been closed