Does this mean more Storage Lands?
Spoilers, Rumors, and Speculation forum
Posted on Jan. 1, 2015, 9:04 p.m. by Hickorysbane
Do you think Crucible of the Spirit Dragon hints at the rest of the lands of that cycle? Or even expanding it into a ten(I guess actually eleven)-card cycle? Or is it just that I'm obsessed with completing cycles and this means absolutely nothing?
The others are Calciform Pools, Dreadship Reef, Molten Slagheap, Fungal Reaches, and Saltcrusted Steppe.
It's probably not a cycle and I don't think anything should be expected of it. And I hope they're isnt. Honestly the land they showed is kinda slow on most ends.
January 2, 2015 1:22 a.m.
shinobigarth says... #4
i think they just said "hey remember storage lands? lets do that but a dragon version." because the last ones were slow as crap or anything.
January 2, 2015 3:24 a.m.
Hickorysbane says... #5
Well that sounds good. I was hoping that they weren't going to print more of them. I've never been fond of those lands, and it looks like I wasn't the only one.
January 2, 2015 10:53 a.m.
Named_Tawyny says... #6
The only storage lands I've ever really been a fan of were the originals Sand Silos, etc...
Stores mana, rather than halving the mana to switch colours.
January 2, 2015 11:45 a.m.
shinobigarth says... #7
yeah having to pay AND tap it to add a counter is stupid especially if you can only then use what you've collected on dragons, who are slow to get out anyway.
Epochalyptik says... #2
Definitely not in FRF.
We already have the fetches being reprinted and the ten new refuges. Any nonbasics on top of those will be unique.
Also, it's generally not wise to speculate on cycles based on standalone utility lands like this one. Often, the opposite is the case; standalone lands exist for flavor and function, not to be copied and made less unique by five or ten other versions.
January 1, 2015 9:12 p.m.