Enemy Fecthes in Commander 2015
Spoilers, Rumors, and Speculation forum
Posted on Aug. 23, 2015, 10:08 p.m. by NoPantsParade
What do you guys make of this?
http://m.imgur.com/8ZmUIW3
Sorry, I'm on my phone and don't feel like linking since my phone is about to explode; otherwise, I'd type more and link it.
Found this on Reddit
I dunno. If it's really going to be in Commander 2015, it's awesome and the price is going to drop a ton (most likely at least). However, because there is no solid evidence from WOTC backing this up, I doubt it :/
August 23, 2015 10:14 p.m.
Ali_from_cairo says... #4
http://wildweasel339.deviantart.com/art/Monolith-Desert-346162191
Ripped off deviantart, not confirmed fake or real but...
August 23, 2015 10:20 p.m. Edited.
I mean I am not the best at calling out fakes but that does not personally impress me and looks like some one just took a picture of some things he photoshopped. Anyway I guess we will find out soon enough.
August 23, 2015 10:22 p.m.
GreenGhost says... #6
Looks pretty sweet and I doubt if someone were making a fake they would use new art. I'm going with it being real.
August 23, 2015 10:22 p.m.
NoPantsParade says... #7
My jimmies have been rustled. The one time I go on Reddit, I get my jimmies rustled.
August 23, 2015 10:23 p.m.
Green_Ghost actually new art for confirmed fakes are pretty common its not hard to find art that matches cards
August 23, 2015 10:26 p.m.
GreenGhost says... #9
Huh I stand corrected. I guess I want the fetches pretty bad.
August 23, 2015 10:28 p.m.
The artwork for arid mesa from deviantart says Lane Brown art in the bottom left but the card credits the artist to Vincent Proce. The art style doesn't seem to match any of his other MTG card art either. I'll be perfectly happy to be proven wrong but I'm thinking fake
August 23, 2015 10:33 p.m.
Someone named Lane Brown made the art on the Arid Mesa, not Vincent Proce, so these are fake.
Also, the flavor text sounds weird to me, shouldn't they say "is now" instead of "was now"?
August 23, 2015 10:39 p.m. Edited.
GreenGhost says... #12
Yeah the flavor text is grammatically incorrect. It also is very similar to the text on the khans fetches.
August 23, 2015 10:47 p.m.
Also, the art used on Scalding Tarn looks nothing like Swanland's art.
August 23, 2015 10:58 p.m.
FAMOUSWATERMELON says... #14
Aw, I was really exited for a sec... Those lands could definitely use a reprint. Oh well, they could still be in C15.
August 23, 2015 11:05 p.m.
JakeHarlow says... #15
Definitely fake. The flavor text (why is there any anyhow?) is super amateur and grammatically suspect.
August 23, 2015 11:08 p.m.
JakeHarlow having flavor text is not odd the reprints of things like Windswept Heath have flavor text but yeah if it is grammatically incorrect then thats lame.
August 23, 2015 11:49 p.m.
demagicman says... #17
Honestly, I would prefer not to have them in a Commander set. Probably an unpopular opinion, however I feel that printing them in a Commander set is going to be forcing some people to buy a product they might not want. I mean people bought the one that had Flusterstorm in it only for the Flusterstorm. And that drove up the price of that deck, and same thing with the True-Name Nemesis one. It like the idea of when I have a Khans pack in my hands that it possibly has a fetch or a foil fetch in it. And the Commander product would make that feeling of not knowing be not there. I just think an actual set would be a good place for the Enemy Fetches, personal opinion.
August 24, 2015 12:45 a.m.
mathimus55 says... #20
They're cool proxies I guess, but that's about it.
August 24, 2015 12:13 p.m.
That is definitely fake. the art is copied off of deviantart and the flavor texts are exactly like the khans fetches, so i say fake.
JWiley129 says... #2
If it's real, then that's sweet. If it's not, then someone trolled the whole community. Either way, just wait until PAX this weekend.
August 23, 2015 10:12 p.m.