Ensoul Artifact

Spoilers, Rumors, and Speculation forum

Posted on July 3, 2014, 12:39 a.m. by CastleSiege

Am I the only one who thinks this card has some serious potential?

some_text

What other good implications might this have?

GoldGhost012 says... #2

How about a 5/5 Ornithopter turn 2? I think that's pretty good.

July 3, 2014 12:40 a.m.

CastleSiege says... #3

Damn, didn't even think of Ornithopter !

July 3, 2014 12:42 a.m.

brokendwarf says... #4

maximum yes

July 3, 2014 12:43 a.m.

this card is sweet. I really like the Darksteel Citadel plan. its an indestructible 5/5 that is still a land. that is really good. so is the flying 5/5 on turn 2

July 3, 2014 12:59 a.m.

APPLE01DOJ says... #6

did they really just possibly give Infect & Affinity a boost?

Not sure if they're just reprinting affinity staples or actually trying to push it in standard.

I mean... Inkmoth Nexus + This....

July 3, 2014 1:05 a.m.

APPLE01DOJ says... #7

thats a potential T3 win.

July 3, 2014 1:05 a.m.

CastleSiege says... #8

As for Inkmoth Nexus , I'd assume the enchantment would fall off as soon as your turn is over, meaning you'd have to enchant it again to get in 5 more -1/-1 counters. That's still pretty sweet though.

July 3, 2014 1:09 a.m.

This card is freaking sweet. This thing does have serious potential. I'll take four please.

July 3, 2014 1:18 a.m.

CastleSiege says... #10

Not standard, but Darksteel Relic is another good candidate to be enchanted by this card haha.

July 3, 2014 1:21 a.m.

It's Tezzeret, Agent of Bolas 's -1 on an Aura. Interesting.

I wonder what Khans has to offer in the way of Affinty stuff.

July 3, 2014 1:45 a.m.

That wording is really really bad, by the way.

Not WOTC's usual.

hmm....

July 3, 2014 2:47 a.m.

Kizmetto says... #13

Dont lose your waaaaaaaaaaay

July 3, 2014 3:18 a.m.

spyroswiz says... #14

In draft the interaction between this and Darksteel Citadel is pretty sweet!

July 3, 2014 4:37 a.m.

JWiley129 says... #15

spyroswiz - While cool I find that to be unlikely, since they're both uncommons.

July 3, 2014 4:40 a.m.

Man, so many possibilities.I'll be getting 4.This will probably make some form of standard artifact deck viable.

I mean even on Darksteel Ingot this thing sounds fun lol

5/5 indestructible mana tapper, sure why not for LOLs.

July 3, 2014 6:29 a.m.

Skraz1265 says... #17

Darksteel Citadel Ornithopter Springleaf Drum scuttling doom engine Shrapnel Blast Chief Engineer Darksteel Ingot Soul of New Phyrexia probably Lightning Strike and some random support cards like Rapid Hybridization void snare, etc. and you have yourself a deck.

July 3, 2014 7:26 a.m.

smackjack says... #18

Im gonna try this out in my Bots. deck :)

July 3, 2014 8:39 a.m.

slovakattack says... #19

I like it a lot... kinda hoping that the wording isn't as bad as it seems, but...

July 3, 2014 8:50 a.m.

smackjack says... #20

The wording is real.. MaRo

July 3, 2014 8:55 a.m.

slovakattack says... #21

Oh boy. This card is gonna go places...

July 3, 2014 8:56 a.m.

Eyes open wide. Between this and the Scuttling Doom Engine, my deck won't be that janky anymore with a Hellkite Tyrant + Goblin Kaboomist win condition...

July 3, 2014 9:32 a.m.

Rayenous says... #23

Now I'm just wondering if Turn to Frog reprint is going to have the new wording of "base power and toughness".

July 3, 2014 11:13 a.m.

Rayenous says... #24

...and why doesn't "Kalonian Twingrove" use that wording?

Shouldn't it be "This creature's base power and toughness are each equal to the number of forests you control."

You would think they would be consistent in a change like this.

July 3, 2014 11:17 a.m.

spyroswiz says... #25

JWiley129 dont destroy my dream :P

July 3, 2014 1:50 p.m.

The "base power and toughness" isn't what I was talking about.

It's mostly just the way that whole block of text is organized. Like, it really seems off.

July 3, 2014 4:46 p.m.

GoldGhost012 says... #27

vampirelazarus, it was spoiled on a YouTube video. The quality's a bit off.

July 3, 2014 4:50 p.m.

Still though, the wording doesn't make me happy. I wasn't happy with some of the wording in Theros either, but I can't remember specifically what it was. Oh, it was Ajani, Mentor of Heroes . Somethings weird about that +1

July 3, 2014 10:01 p.m.

GoldGhost012 says... #29

Which 1?

Ba dum tiss.

July 3, 2014 10:02 p.m.

Did not realize he had two +1's.

The first one.

July 3, 2014 10:38 p.m.

CastleSiege says... #31

So does anyone think this card will be viable in modern? :o

July 5, 2014 5:16 p.m.

Apoptosis says... #32

GoldGhost012, holy crap that's going to be a beast of a combo in standard. Izzet aggro!

July 5, 2014 10:36 p.m.

This discussion has been closed