Guess what they just spoiled?

Spoilers, Rumors, and Speculation forum

Posted on Jan. 6, 2014, 2:16 a.m. by JWiley129

M15! Yeah, I know, that's not exciting. But look at the art on the release page. Plus they have listed under products a "Clash Pack."

Also, Veil-cursed Garruk in the core set maybe?

ShadowLand says... #2

I saw this article, I got excited. It's already up on my blog. Love it.

January 6, 2014 2:20 a.m.

Unforgivn_II says... #3

Dang, if they make another Garruk he'll be up there with Jace and Chandra for the most printings with different names. A reprint of a flip card in a core set seems unlikely

January 6, 2014 2:22 a.m.

mckin says... #4

Clash pack is probably the new name for the little 2 player mini deck packs, notice no event deck also

January 6, 2014 2:25 a.m.

JWiley129 says... #5

Unforgivn_II - I agree that DFCs showing up in the core sets is unlikely. But idk what else to think about that art. BUT that kinda hints that Garruk isn't showing up in 2014, outside of the main sets (BNG, JNX, and Huey). But we kinda knew Garruk wouldn't show up in Theros, so that's not surprising.

January 6, 2014 2:27 a.m.

ryuzaki32667 says... #6

my thought is that it may be continuing off of the innistrad lore about how garruk was cursed, his flip side was b/g, my friend says he wants garruk to be mono black, thats crazy in my eyes, only thing i can think of to support that is the purple glowing eyes, maybe thats liliana curse and its fully enveloped him to the dark side

January 6, 2014 2:41 a.m.

DukeNicky says... #7

Pro tour in Portland!? Hell yes I have another reason to go back to that awesome town! AHahha

January 6, 2014 3:11 a.m.

I wish I were still stationed in Washington state... Portland is so cool, wish I could go. Unfortunately FL is the complete continental opposite of Oregon.

January 6, 2014 4:45 a.m.

meecht says... #9

Garruk is a Green-aligned planeswalker. There's no way he'd be mono-black, but B/G is a definite possibility after being veil-cursed by Liliana.

January 6, 2014 9:23 a.m.

This discussion has been closed