Jeweled Lotus

Spoilers, Rumors, and Speculation forum

Posted on Oct. 29, 2020, 6:19 p.m. by Nemesis

Well folks, they did it. Can you people say, "power creep"?

So uh... thoughts? what does this do to the cEDH community?

WTF is this???? Unbelievable. But honestly I don't thin it will be amazing. But I could be totally wrong, as T1 Urza, Lord High Artificer is great. I really want to get a box of it now lol.

October 29, 2020 6:22 p.m.

StopShot says... #3

I just made a thread discussing my thoughts on this. You can read what I have to say on it here.

October 29, 2020 6:26 p.m.

tacolover25 says... #4

This can't be real.

October 29, 2020 6:30 p.m.

RiotRunner789 says... #5

I want this card but also don't want it to exist.

October 29, 2020 6:43 p.m.

abby315 says... #6

ah christ

October 29, 2020 6:47 p.m.

Might I suggest StopShot's thread of the same topic that was created first? Just seems a little unfair

October 29, 2020 6:49 p.m.

Nemesis says... #8

Omniscience_is_life: First, if you'll look at the times for when both threads were created, they were created within the same minute. Second, seeing as this doesn't have any clear indications that it's trying to steal a person's thunder, bandying about the phrase "unfair" is uncalled for.

Caerwyn: can you please close this thread since another one has been opened on this topic?

October 29, 2020 6:53 p.m.

Sorry to seem disrespectful, apologies :)

October 29, 2020 7:04 p.m.

StopShot says... #10

I don't hold it against Nemesis for making this thread either. I actually think it speaks levels to how crazy this card is that it could generate two threads immediately at the same time.

October 29, 2020 7:08 p.m.

StopShot I'm not trying to hate, more along the lines of "hey maybe we could consolidate". Given that that's NOT what I ended up saying, and instead something a little more hostile, I apologize once more

October 29, 2020 7:11 p.m.

StopShot says... #12

Omniscience_is_life, I'm not saying to put you under the bus either. The unfairness isn't a personal matter, but one that splits the conversation into two smaller discussions which dilutes the discourse. I didn't want my comment to come off as hostile, so I'm sorry you took it that way.

October 29, 2020 7:18 p.m.

Makes sense :)

Pretty sure we agree, then.

October 29, 2020 7:21 p.m.

Always hard to tell over the internet lol

October 29, 2020 7:24 p.m.

RNR_Gaming says... #15

This almost breaks 4 cmc or less mono/dual color commanders. Having the constraint of a single color and only being for commanders is still a very light oppurnity cost. I feel this was meant as a means to help get the chunkier cmc commanders out but...it's probably just going to end up being an actual auto include in every deck.

October 29, 2020 7:28 p.m.

Azdranax says... #16

It’s currently more expensive to preorder the single than it is to preorder a box...LOL!

October 29, 2020 8:16 p.m.

Caerwyn says... #17

Per the request of the thread’s owner, I am locking this thread as it is redundant with an existing thread. Discussion on this card can be found here.

October 29, 2020 8:24 p.m.

This discussion has been closed