Mantis Rider!

Spoilers, Rumors, and Speculation forum

Posted on Sept. 5, 2014, 7:59 a.m. by Infinimage007

So.... we've got a Lightning Angel replacement!

Mantis Rider

Creature-Human Monk

Flying, vigilance, haste

3/3

I don't know how to do images so if anyone would like to that would be great.

adventfaith says... #2

September 5, 2014 8:06 a.m.

Infinimage007 says... #3

Thank you!

September 5, 2014 8:07 a.m.

Jay says... #4

Flavor text is frightening

September 5, 2014 8:34 a.m.

derKochXXL says... #5

I love this card. Now I want the Jeskai Charm and I'm sold on this clan.

September 5, 2014 8:35 a.m.

tooTimid says... #6

Is it worth pointing out that this guy is riding a mantis?

Wow!

September 5, 2014 8:54 a.m.

GreatSword says... #7

Reminds me of Lightning Angel .

September 5, 2014 9:42 a.m.

Osang says... #8

A definite playset for Jeskai aggro. I love the flavor text so much, even if it takes up everything.

September 5, 2014 9:52 a.m.

Korombos says... #9

gee I hope the "it's" is a translation error and not on the actual card....

September 5, 2014 10:11 a.m.

rho.reduction says... #10

Korombos: I can't unsee it...

September 5, 2014 1:39 p.m.

Infinimage007 says... #11

It's just a translated mockup right now. The Korean version was spoiled.

September 5, 2014 1:41 p.m.

It's the bolt bug, we still do names right?

September 5, 2014 6:15 p.m.

subrosian says... #13

The misuse of apostrophes hurts my soul... Hopefully the official English visuals come out soon. Seems like a solid card though.

September 5, 2014 7:14 p.m.

TheRedDude says... #14

Id say better than Lightning Angel cuz Angel drops t 4 with only one extra toughness, and this is much more Standard playable :P

September 5, 2014 7:46 p.m.

NerdPounder says... #15

Idk, one argument you could make is that Lightning Angel dodges Lightning Bolt (which is kind of ironic) but I agree it's probably better than Lightning Angel.

September 5, 2014 10:53 p.m.

Femme_Fatale says... #16

Card image added: Mantis Rider .

September 9, 2014 1:45 a.m.

This discussion has been closed