Possible Leaked Info on Dragons of Tarkir
Spoilers, Rumors, and Speculation forum
Posted on Feb. 27, 2015, 3:15 p.m. by WovenNebula
This link is to a Redditor that translated leaked info
This link is leaked information in another language THE ORIGINAL
I'm not sure who to thank or credit for this info if true.
The info suggests enemy Fetchlands will be printed in this set and other interesting material.
Sound off below and let's speculate!!
WovenNebula says... #4
@smackjack the fetches are just suggestive interpretation. Where they talk about the set being enemy colors and earlier in the article they talk about lands that fit the Khans block theme. Etc.. Up to interpetation...
February 27, 2015 3:26 p.m.
I don't really think that the dragons in Fate were originally supposed to be enemy colored means that the enemy fetches will be printed in Dragons.
February 27, 2015 3:28 p.m.
chrishuffman95 says... #6
Looking on Reddit mentions something called Megamorph. Can somebody confirm?
February 27, 2015 3:31 p.m.
Except they said later on that the dragonbroods were allied colored, NOT enemy colored. Also I can't find that quote where they talk about the lands that WovenNebula mentioned.
AKA, Dragons of Tarkir is a Ally Color set ( 
, 
, 
, 
, 
). Which is a nice contrast to the Wedge theme of Khans of Tarkir, where we saw no allied gold cards.
February 27, 2015 3:33 p.m.
Femme_Fatale says... #8
I do not see anything suggesting enemy fetchlands. It also does not make sense in an ally dual-coloured block.
February 27, 2015 3:35 p.m.
WovenNebula says... #9
@chrishuffman95 there is reference to that ability near the end of the article. Something to do with morph creatures that come into play with +1/+1 counters
February 27, 2015 3:36 p.m.
chrishuffman95 - It seems that Megamorph creatures get a +1/+1 counter when flipped face up. Nothing more than that. We'll just have to wait and see come Monday.
February 27, 2015 3:38 p.m.
WovenNebula says... #11
Lines 60-71 they talk about enemy colors. My interpetation anyways.
February 27, 2015 3:39 p.m.
TheAnnihilator says... #12
A quote regarding the color scheme of DTK (also, pls fetched pls):
"Therefore, I reviewed our options and made a decision: Dragons Tarkir would use the theme of enemy colors."
So, enemy fetches are likely if I say so myself.
February 27, 2015 3:44 p.m.
They do talk about enemy colors WovenNebula, but a few paragraphs later Maro says that DTK is an Ally set, not an enemy one. And there was no part that I saw that referenced lands in DTK. The only info I found worthwhile was that the drafting wouldn't change much if Khans block went Wedge -> FRF -> Enemy whereas the drafting changes somewhat with Wedge -> FRF -> Ally.
February 27, 2015 3:44 p.m.
TheAnnihilator says... #15
JWiley129 See the quote I pulled out please! It's line 71 in the article.
February 27, 2015 3:47 p.m.
Megamorph is what is mentioned in the spanish article above. Basically, it is morph, but when the creature unmorphs, it gets a +1/+1 counter, which seems very stupid to me - not too much thought put into this one.
February 27, 2015 3:53 p.m.
TheAnnihilator - But then later in the article Maro mentions how Erik Lauer said that Wedge -> Enemy won't work. It also doesn't make sense given that the Legendary dragons from FRF are ally colored. I don't want to be that guy, but RTFA (read the f** article). He CLEARLY states that Dragons will be Ally colored and that is why the center of each wedge is one of the ally colors and NOT one the shared enemy.
February 27, 2015 3:56 p.m.
WovenNebula says... #18
@JWiley129 thanks for pointing that out when I fist skimmed it that's all I saw. The lands I read was in another article on reddit and ally does make sense. The enemy Fetchlands still make sense to be in this block, of how the block has been set up thus far. Time travel does crazy things. Lol. My prior predictions have been spot on for this block, I should play some lotto ... Anyways continue to speculate lol
February 27, 2015 4:06 p.m.
Kingzerker says... #19
Love how rough this translation is lol. Kinda makes me skeptical of its validity. There's parts that you could easily correct... Fate Reforged is referred to in the translation as "Rewritten Destiny", sets are instead "collections", and shards are "fragments".
Odd translation aside, it sounds very reasonable. Confirms that Dragons of Tarkir is focused on allied colors. Not only did it explain why they decided against enemy colors (draft experience) but further supported why each clan's main color wasn't the axis color and instead an ally color (continuity purposes).
I'm disappointed that megamorph is the next step for morph. It seems pretty meh. But I'm not surprised about the lack of enemy fetches, wasn't expecting those anyways.
February 27, 2015 4:19 p.m.
CanadianShinobi says... #20
So slightly off topic, but when do spoilers start of Dragons?
All in all I'm with Femme on this one.
February 27, 2015 4:23 p.m.
TheAnnihilator says... #22
@JWiley129
I respect you in my posts to you, so please lend me the same courtesy. =D This is friendly discussion after all.
I did, in fact, read the whole article. The portion you mention about wedge->enemy refers to why FRF was allied colors, and thus they printed the allied dragons there. They chose to make FRF allied because it messes with limited to draft KTK (Wedge) with FRF (Enemy, as they wanted to do at the time) because then, and I quote "... Draftear [translation: Drafting] color combinations ... would be too similar." (Line 77)
In light of this, they decided to prioritize making FRF allied colors, and DTK enemy colors. So, I maintain that DTK will be enemy focused.
February 27, 2015 5:02 p.m.
Femme_Fatale says... #23
FRF is enemy coloured focus. DTK is allied coloured focus.
February 27, 2015 5:09 p.m.
Kinda hoping this is an early April fool's day joke because megamorph sounds idiotic.
February 27, 2015 5:10 p.m.
WovenNebula says... #25
Megamorph at this time could be just lost in translation. It could be mighty morph lol all kidding aside it may be something different as it is a bit wonky.
February 27, 2015 5:17 p.m.
I agree with Chubbub because, no offense, megamorph sounds like the name of a Yugioh card. That and it's not really "mega" when it's just a +1/+1 counter, now is it?
February 27, 2015 5:19 p.m.
AngryBearTony says... #29
Pardon, but isn't it backwards? FRF is already allied focus, and DTK just expands on that?
February 27, 2015 5:35 p.m.
Femme_Fatale says... #31
Frf is enemy focused AngryBearTony. DTK is allied focused.
February 27, 2015 5:44 p.m.
AngryBearTony says... #32
Again, do you mean FRF or KTK? Khans was clearly enemy focused. FRF not so much.
February 27, 2015 5:57 p.m.
Femme_Fatale says... #34
DERP. How did I mix Khans up with FRF? FRF was monochrome focused with a touch of enemy.
February 27, 2015 6:33 p.m.
WovenNebula says... #35
The enemy pain lands rotate out with magic origins. So that would make them fit unless the pain lands were recycled in m origins which I doubt. So there were be a void that would need to be filled.
February 27, 2015 6:48 p.m.
Femme_Fatale says... #36
They would most likely be in Origins if anywhere then. Or the set after.
February 27, 2015 6:50 p.m.
ThorneSupremicy says... #37
They had dragon burrials on friendly fetches. They should put khan burrials on enemy fetches for this reality where dragons live.
smackjack says... #2
Tldr.. Someone quote the fetch info?
February 27, 2015 3:22 p.m.