"illegal" card for pauper
TappedOut forum
Posted on March 15, 2018, 2:16 a.m. by zigkid3
Was making a pauper EDH deck as seen here:
http://tappedout.net/mtg-decks/cliffhaven-pauper-edh/?cb=1521094293
As far as I'm aware Cliffhaven Vampire is uncommon and the rules for a pauper EDH deck was that the commander can be common/uncommon while the rest of the library has to have been printed as commons at some point in time.
However the website thinks that Cliffhaven Vampire is not pauper legal. I am guessing it's because the site simply looks to see if a card has any common prints and if not its labeled as illegal, but the site doesn't take into consideration that it's being used as the commander?
I have learned to ignore the legality on TO. It is often not correct. Make sure to check Gatherer for actual legality of the cards if TO marks soemthing as illegal.
March 15, 2018 6:26 a.m.
It does the same for all of my PDH decks too. Originally it said EVERY card was illegal and not it just says my uncommon Commander is. Maybe they're still working it out?
March 15, 2018 9:03 a.m.
I've put it on our dev board to update this legality, but it might take awhile because we have a long list. Just know it's noted!
enpc says... #2
Please post this in the official missing/incorrect card/token thread here.
March 15, 2018 2:59 a.m.