Missing Card
TappedOut forum
Posted on Sept. 27, 2015, 11:38 p.m. by ThisNameUnavailable
In the deck builder, I tried just now to add only the Breaking side of Breaking//Entering and I cannot add the foil promo version, the only one listed is the dragons maze version and it can't find the 000 version when i manually enter it.
ThisNameUnavailable says... #3
No, I want to add only the Breaking side, promo, or the other side will count towards my mana balance and stuff.
September 29, 2015 1:18 p.m.
Femme_Fatale says... #4
To be honest, those individual cards shouldn't even be in the list. I don't know when they were added. See if yeago will eventually put in the choice to manually input a card's cmc. I'd rather not do anything with things that shouldn't actually be in the database.
September 29, 2015 2:38 p.m.
ThisNameUnavailable says... #5
But for instance if you take a strictly blue black deck, it will never be able to cast the Entering portion of the card, so there is no use in including it in the mana base. If it includes the extra red and black mana symbols, it becomes infinitely harder to correctly balance the proportions of colours of lands in that deck. You seriously think separating a fuse card isn't useful, even a little bit? Really?!
September 29, 2015 6:13 p.m.
Femme_Fatale says... #6
No, because they aren't actually individual cards. Like I said, if Yeago implements the ability to modify how a card's cmc and colour appears in your deck (by the method of which we modify everything, through the use of a bracket, preferably these {} and with the cost portrayed in them {2WWW} for example), those things wouldn't be needed. I expect it to be implemented eventually, as lots of other users have requested the feature.
The halves of dual cards Wear for example were probably put into the database from when yeago did an automatic import of our entire database from a third party, meaning they are in here by complete accident as it wasn't quality checked.
Unless someone can say otherwise that this was a requested and accepted feature, I stand by saying that they should be removed in the near future once more encompassing alternatives are available.
September 29, 2015 6:26 p.m. Edited.
ThisNameUnavailable says... #7
But if they clearly have a use for some people, why not wait to remove them until you can get the new system up? Is it really causing such havoc and chaos on the system that it's worth removing them and making some people's lives harder?
September 29, 2015 9:24 p.m.
ThisNameUnavailable says... #8
Also so what if they are not individual cards? I know that, but putting a red mana symbol in a blue black deck is utterly pointless. Separating them allows people to balance their decks in a practical manner. Do you really want to force people to put a colour into their deck that they have no intention of using, making it harder for them to balance their decks properly, and for what?
September 29, 2015 9:28 p.m.
Femme_Fatale says... #9
I hope you realize that I specifically said in previous posts that they will stay in the database until more encompassing alternatives can be implemented. The ability to manually change a card's cmc and colour is the more encompassing alternative that would solve your issue. It's more encompassing, as it solves plenty of other issues on this site and is a frequently requested feature.
Femme_Fatale says... #2
Breaking / Entering
September 28, 2015 3:17 a.m.