New forum section
TappedOut forum
Posted on Nov. 13, 2015, 5 a.m. by tyforthevenom
I think there should be a section or 2 of the forum dedicated to 2hg considering how wizards announced oath will be the first set to actively support the format
I thought this would be about stuff like 2hg standard or modern. I thought 2hg was normally done for all stores on prerelease as my LGS has 2 or 3 2hg tournaments on one of the 3 days of prerelease weekend.
Oh well either way I am glad to hear them say that the set works better with 2hg better than most as it's a lot of fun.
November 13, 2015 6:58 a.m.
Epochalyptik says... #5
2HG is typically a variation of some existing format. Is there a reason the existing format forums can't be used for the odd 2HG thread?
November 13, 2015 7:24 a.m.
tyforthevenom says... #6
Because technically 2hg is the format in that case and saying "standard" etc is just card restriction similar to pauper, ive seen pauper standard modern legacy etc... 2hg has a ban list (or used to though I'm pretty sure it's just the one card) it is a format itself
November 13, 2015 8:51 a.m. Edited.
Epochalyptik says... #7
I guess what I'm asking is whether there needs to be a separate forum to discuss 2HG. If you're playing Standard 2HG, then people who play Limited 2HG probably won't be as helpful to you as people who play Standard. And is 2HG even popular enough in the community to warrant an additional forum? I'm not in the business of adding anything that doesn't need to be added. I'm a minimalist when it comes to forums and hubs.
November 13, 2015 9:16 a.m.
tyforthevenom says... #8
I'd put it to a vote but there's no polls function in this forum
November 13, 2015 9:18 a.m.
m.j.m.p.email says... #10
So... Wizards can't fix their own site's comments and now they want to mess with tappedout?
November 13, 2015 9:52 a.m.
Epochalyptik says... #11
First, what are you talking about?
Second, please don't format your comments with hard-to-read styling.
November 13, 2015 9:58 a.m.
m.j.m.p.email says... #12
Never mind. I misunderstood the thread. Define "hard to read".
The_Raven says... #2
Is that true? Do they really support it on paper? Source?
Sounds awesome if they do!
November 13, 2015 5:53 a.m.