Sealed Deck / Playtest Error

TappedOut forum

Posted on Oct. 20, 2011, 4:38 p.m. by Daveedo

Everytime I make a Sealed Deck in Innistrad I get an Angel of Flight Alabaster . I believe it has to do with the programming that it takes the first instance of a rare which is AoFA and then starts randomizing.

When playtesting I noticed some tokens don't pop up even though you have cards that produce them. I think it would be great to add a standard token that will always show up.

DeckBuilder345 says... #2

Huh tried it myself and sure enough there was the angel.

October 20, 2011 5:08 p.m.

IPyro92 says... #3

I just setup 20 sealed ISD only decks 18/20 had an Angel of Flight Alabaster only 2 did not. So I agree there is an issue with the probability of getting the angel.I think there is an issue with rares occuring as foils also because one of the sealed decks I generated had a total of 10 rares and mythic rares, 2 of which were Garruk Relentless  Flip  FlipMTG Card: Garruk, the Veil-Cursed (this is not the first time I have gotten two of him from the sealed generator.

October 20, 2011 5:48 p.m.

IPyro92 says... #4

All 20 generated decks are on my profile and I put all of the cards into one deck to take a look at the totals, it can be seen here, isd-sealed-20-totals.

October 20, 2011 7:41 p.m.

Daveedo says... #5

Haven't seen any changes to sealed deck making. I am still pulling an Angel of Flight Alabaster in every sealed I make. I just want to know if this problem will be addressed or should I just play on another site?

November 1, 2011 6:40 p.m.

squire1 says... #6

Thanks for letting us know everyone. It has been added to our workflow and we will hopefully be resolving this issue soon. Ornithopter s are being deployed now.

November 2, 2011 9:07 a.m.

yeaGO says... #7

I think this is fixed--can someone verify?

November 11, 2011 10:35 p.m.

IPyro92 says... #8

I would agree that it seems to be fixed here is a link to the total from 10 sealed decks inn 10 sealed 2nd check.

November 12, 2011 12:53 p.m.

This discussion has been closed