Suggestion: Deck Versions
TappedOut forum
Posted on Sept. 23, 2016, 9:21 a.m. by ducttapedeckbox
Sometimes a user will create multiple iterations of a deck - perhaps budget and non-budget version, or maybe they play the same deck and want to maintain a pre- and post-rotation build.
My suggestion is to create "tabs" at the top of the deck page so that there are multiple version of the deck under the same deck name. This would help players who build budget/non-budget or competitive/not-competitive versions of their deck, help organize and maintain pre- and post-rotation builds, and simply create versions for different metas and play styles.
For those of you who play League, many sites that support guides use this feature so that a player can create, for example, a top and jungle guide for the same champion under the same guide name.
Would you be interested in this feature? Is this doable, YeaGo?
ducttapedeckbox says... #8
How would we want descriptions to work?
The most obvious is to have the descriptions change with the deck list. The deck builder can then customize the description to the versions deck. Perhaps a checkbox if you want to write one description and have it appear all versions (i.e. just small changes for budget options).
The other would be to have two parts to the description: a static part and a dynamic part. The static part would be constant across all deck versions, while the dynamic part would change based on the version. There could be a checkbox to toggle the dynamic option on/off if someone doesn't want to use it.
The first option sounds easier to implement from a coding perspective, but I think the second option would be very useful. There are easily more options to consider - so what would you guys like to see?
September 23, 2016 6:24 p.m.
Maybe we can incorporate this into deck Updates, @yeaGO?
September 23, 2016 7:54 p.m.
YeaGo is tagged automatically in every thread thats in the tappedout forum.
September 24, 2016 4:07 a.m.
Sim_Will_CMcantfindmehopefully says... #11
I would use the fuck out of this feature! I would pay for that feature!!
clayperce says... #2
+1!
That would be SO nice (if easily doable)!
September 23, 2016 9:33 a.m.