Can I equip my Livewire Lash on my teammate's creature in a 2 headed dragon game?

Asked by insertcleverid 13 years ago

Livewire Lash ?

popeyroach says... Accepted answer #1

I believe that you can't equip equipment you control to creatures you don't control. if you took control of your teammate's creature you could equip it and it would stay equiped if your teammate regained control of it.

I believe you can enchant your teammate's creatures though.

February 10, 2011 5:40 p.m.

Emn1ty says... #2

Not usually, no. Everything that has to do with an individual player's field is not shared by the team. The only thing shared by the team in the game is life total.

February 10, 2011 5:41 p.m.

theemptyquiver says... #3

No. Life points are the only shared resource in a 2HG game.

The same rule that prevents you from attaching equipment from an opponent is basically what prevents this as well, but it is easier to remember by thinking of it in terms of a resource that cannot be shared.

Some of the older equipment cards print the ruling parenthetically for equipment use.

February 10, 2011 5:43 p.m.

theemptyquiver says... #4

It was like a cascade of answers! haha.

February 10, 2011 5:44 p.m.

Legendinc says... #5

i don't know about you guys, but he asked the question, specifically asking for a 2 Headed Dragon game, not a 2 Headed Giant game.

2 Headed Dragon (at least in my area) is a style of multiplayer team play, where the team shares EVERYTHING, from land/mana base, to creature control.

February 11, 2011 4:13 p.m.

Emn1ty says... #6

Never heard of two headed dragon and if that was the case then why would this even be an issue?

February 11, 2011 5:34 p.m.

Legendinc says... #7

because in two headed dragon, the team members share everything on the board, land, enchantments and creatures.

ergo, if in a two headed dragon match, you control both creatures you've casted personally, AND your teammates casted creatures, then you can equip artifact - equipments you own onto a creature your team member has casted

February 11, 2011 6:59 p.m.

This discussion has been closed